Blogs, Wikis and Websites
Over the past few weeks I have developed this blog, a wiki and now my very own website via Weebly. Each time I step up to the plate, I surprise myself by how much I learn and how much I enjoy working within each new medium. It was only after I completed my blog last week and read others that I realised many found the wikispace cumbersome. I feel this may be because these students were technically advanced and were already comfortable in blogs and websites and now that I have created my own website (with ease!) I too am learning towards this forum. All three have the capability to demonstrate connectivism in action (the proposition being that knowledge is distributed across a network of connections). All have the ability to take students to a higher order of thinking as defined by Bloom and as required by ACARA.
My website (link here) is something that I look forward
to continuing to develop. I have chosen to focus the site on those pedagogies
and tools that are really hitting home to me. My first link, featured on my
home page, is the Angela Lee Duckworth video discussing GRIT on TED. All
photographs are my own, taken of children I have permission to feature. The Weebly
appeals to my sense of order, I need to see the “big picture” before getting
down to the nitty gritty. And while it’s important to understand how I like to
learn, I need to approach each lesson plan with my students in mind, and I
think different student and different content will gel with a unique set of
learning tools.
Below is an overview of the three mediums via a SWOT Analysis. I have included some ideas as to how I could utilise each in the classroom under the OPPORTUNITY column and addressed ethical and legal issues under THREATS. It goes without saying that a possible weakness to all three tools is access to the net and a computer is necessary both at school and at home for many of these ideas to be developed. Students would also need initial lessons to ensure they have the skills to navigate the mediums.
Below is an overview of the three mediums via a SWOT Analysis. I have included some ideas as to how I could utilise each in the classroom under the OPPORTUNITY column and addressed ethical and legal issues under THREATS. It goes without saying that a possible weakness to all three tools is access to the net and a computer is necessary both at school and at home for many of these ideas to be developed. Students would also need initial lessons to ensure they have the skills to navigate the mediums.
Strengths
|
Weaknesses
|
Opportunities
|
Threats
|
|
BLOGS
- Single
Author Posting
- Comments
section drives interaction.
- Chronological
order of posts
-
Reflective therefore easy to see Author/Idea development
-Supports
transformational learning
-Encourages
HOL thinking skills
- Modification achieved when well designed. |
-Utilises
technology many students already engaged in.
-
Interactive
-Accessible
to many.
-
Collaborative forum allows introduction of a variety of new ideas.
-
Parents can view the teaching of their child.
-Links
and various teaching tools can be viewed on one forum.
-
Scaffolding of ideas.
|
- One
must look into comments following each post to participate in discussions.
-
Driven by Author
-
Some individuals may feel threatened by environment.
-
Potential for cyber-bullying.
-
Potential for inappropriate content links
|
-
Students could engage with teachers from afar.
-
Gives Authors a forum to share their ideas a create a community
- An
example of using a blog in the classroom: Each student could chose a
historical character from the subject period and keep a “diary” as the term
progresses. Not only would this display their learning journey, other class
members could comment “in character” from their perspective
|
-
Requires constant monitoring by teacher to ensure there is no cyber-bullying
or inappropriate content
-
Open to the public
-
Reserved students may not want to post their comments in such a public forum.
Blogs are often dominated by strong personalities who repeatedly respond to
opinions that differ to their own.
|
WIKIS
-Multiple
Authors
- All
have input
-
Used for collaborative learning
-Scaffolding
of ideas as students add to group knowledge
-
Supports transformational learning
-
Encourages HOL thinking skills
- Modification achieved when well designed. |
-Everyone
can have input and the lack of an “Owner” means it is less threatening to
tentative internet users.
-
Student Driven
-
Excellent ideas forum.
-Encourages
new ideas
-Collaborative.
- Multi-media
input friendly
- Seen
as a less aggressive format than a Blog.
|
-Cumbersome
to use
-
limited content control
-
Open ended
-
Conclusions need to be driven.
-
design issues eg. too many editors
- layout means the placement of links is not always logical/easy to find. |
- The
collaborative process can be done as a homework exercise while the
conclusions lend themselves to classroom activities.
- An
example of a Wiki in action. Students could be presented with a historical
statement and be asked to respond via de Bonos hats (each group of four given
their own Wikispace). The following day their in class activity could be to discuss,
come to some conclusion a present an arguement.
|
-
Requires constant monitoring by teacher to ensure there is no cyber-bullying
or inappropriate content
- Copyright
breeches
- Data lost due to editing errors by one of the multiple authors. |
WEBSITES
-Usually
one Author
- Comments
section can be added, as can contact links
- Logical
layout allows an overview of numerous ideas
-
Supports connectivism
- Excellent scaffolding of ideas via progressive nature of the Weebly.
-Encourages
HOL thinking skills
- Modification and Redefinition achieved when well designed. |
- One
Author allows clear direction of information.
- Also
has the capability to build in a comments forum to ensure collaborative
thinking.
-Layout
options and innovative tools such a links to videos, galleries, podcasts,
other websites and more.
-
Easy to navigate.
- Parents
may be more comfortable with this forum, especially when Website is teacher
driven.
|
-
Static nature will deter some.
-
Only one perspective as far as design and content.
- The
comments forum may not have the authenticity of a Blog forum that suggests
immediacy. Students to not tend to make websites “favourites” on their
browsers to the same extent they do social media.
- Potential
to be seen as dated.
-
Strength of layout dependent on skills of Author.
|
- The Weebly
is an exciting tool that would allow teachers to create websites specific to any topic/body of learning. Students could also learn to create their own
websites.
- The teacher could create a Weebly that covers the term's History Content. Each lesson could have its own tab and a variety of learning tools could be used (eg picture galleries, maps, videos, podcasts etc). A lesson within the term could include the creation of a Weebly by each student (whereby they could explore just one component of the terms History content). These in turn could be linked on the "HUB" Weebly (ie the teacher's Weebly). A discussion forum could be added to the HUB Weebly. Another lesson could include historical reenactments, giving students the opportunity to develop content for their Weebly (eg photos).
|
-Must
ensure ownership of content and/or correct referencing.
- Accessible
to all.
- Concerns over images of students on the web (this could be managed via original guidelines) |
I would suggest that before engaging in any learning via the web
students not only become familiar with the school policies, they also
collaborate to design their own “contract” for internet use. One that outlines
what is acceptable and unacceptable and suggests repercussions for actions such
as aggressive comments and inappropriate content. This will also ensure
that prior commencement, students highlight to the teacher vicious comments
that may appear innocuous. The students need to have clear guidelines, in
their own terminology to ensure they understand the implications of a post. We must ensure the students feel the medium is a safe environment and as teachers we have an obligation to monitor all comment/blog/posting capabilities (preferably in real time).
The Weebly allows
for both Modification and Redefinition as per SAMR.
. The students are using collaborative spaces to create new tasks, they are
connecting, communicating and creating via new forums. They now
have the ability to work together, from their homes and can introduce new
technologies and solutions with ease.
In conclusion I would say that Blogs, Wikis and Websites all have
merit and open up a world of opportunity to both teacher and student. My
preference at this stage is the website (via Weebly, what a great tool!) as I
like the idea of creating web pages specific to learners and subject topics,
giving students the opportunity to explore at will. I would create a comments
page to ensure collaboration. The layout of a website is flexible, easy to
navigate and features tools to ensure those who need to read an overview before
going into specific categories can easily do so. A comments page can also be
created with specific threads – students do not need to search at the end of
each blog, nor are they limited by the layout of the wiki.
Now I’m off to teach my boys how to create their own web pages for
their homework!
Hi Vanessa, Wow! This is fantastic. I really enjoyed reading your post. Your SWOT analysis of the digital pedagogies is great. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteThanks Vanessa
ReplyDeleteI see you have written about all three web 2 tools. This week you were only required to unpack one in detail.
Loved the SWOT thinking.
I suggest a voki, mind map and more technical discussion would have been useful.
The intent is to get you to know how the ICT tools are used and their challenges.
Good use of hyperlinking.